2019 Breakthrough Prizes honor cutting-edge science and math

This year, a total of $22 million will go to researchers pushing boundaries in disease treatments, astrophysics, and more.

Breakthrough Prize cofounders Mark Zuckerberg (left) and Yuri Milner speak onstage during the 2017 Breakthrough Prize ceremony at the NASA Ames Research Center in Mountain View, California.

Scientists and mathematicians who are making strides in human health, developing new technologies, and expanding our knowledge of the cosmos are among the recipients of the 2019 Breakthrough Prizes. Each major prize, awarded in the categories of life sciences, fundamental physics, and mathematics, comes with a $3-million check.

Sponsored by Silicon Valley notables such as Yuri Milner and Mark Zuckerberg, it’s one of the largest science prizes offered, and this year’s awards ceremony, to be broadcast live November 4 on National Geographic, promises to be an appropriately star-studded affair. With Pierce Brosnan hosting, the Breakthrough Prize winners will accept their awards from a variety of presenters, including actors such as Lupita Nyong’o and Zoe Saldana.

“I’m extremely grateful to have been selected,” says MIT’s Angelika Amon, one of the winners of the prize in life sciences. “I’m the representative of all the people who work with me over the years, who this prize is really for—my students and postdocs and trainees, really, they are the winners here.”

Stellar accomplishments

It’s not easy making a discovery that, over time, merits the term “breakthrough.” What often seems like serendipity is really a combination of hard work and enough insight to pay attention to the right details.

That’s exactly what happened for Dame Jocelyn Bell Burnell, the astronomer receiving this year’s Special Prize in Fundamental Physics. As a graduate student in 1967, she noticed an odd bit of data that would prove to be revolutionary: a strange signal in records of radio waves that led her to discover pulsars, a type of object never before seen in the cosmos.

Today, we know that pulsars are rapidly spinning neutron stars, which are the collapsed corpses of stars formerly much larger than the sun. As they spin, pulsars emit beams of radiation that appear like pulses to telescopes on Earth. The Nobel Prize committee awarded its 1974 physics prize for the discovery—to Bell Burnell’s advisor. Now, though, the find has earned her a special Breakthrough prize.

Fittingly, Bell Burnell is a champion for women and minorities in science. And that $3 million check she’s earning? She’s donating it to a charity in the U.K. that supports physics graduate students from under-represented groups.

Golden opportunity

If Bell Burnell’s 1967 discovery could be called the birth of pulsars, it is perhaps fitting that another of this year’s winners earned a prize for studying the deaths of neutron stars.

“In some ways I’m getting a prize for the first time we found out how to destroy neutron stars,” says Columbia University astrophysicist Brian Metzger, who was awarded one of three $100,000 prizes for New Horizons in Physics.

Metzger helped figure out that most of the universe’s gold comes from cataclysmic collisions between neutron stars, a theory that has since been backed up by observations. These intense smashups create what Metzger called a kilonova, a type of explosion that is intermediate in brightness between a supernova (when a dying star explodes) and a nova (when a star has a brief spasm).

In 2010, Metzger came up with a theory describing how bright a kilonova should be, which in turn offered scientists a pile of information about the nuclear physics at the heart of such an explosion, including its potential for synthesizing rare and coveted heavy elements.

In 2017, astronomers caught two neutron stars in the act of merging. The collision was so violent that it shook the fabric of spacetime, producing gravitational waves that alerted thousands of astronomers to the unfurling event. They all watched a kilonova very similar to what Metzger had predicted, and further observations confirmed that the explosion produced gold, platinum, uranium, and other treasured elements.

“We found where gold is coming from in nature, and we saw what happens when two neutron stars slam together and make a black hole,” Metzger says. “How would the world have evolved differently if neutron star mergers were 10 times as common, and gold were not such a rare commodity?”

Counting chromosomes

In the beginning, Metzger says, it took a bit of work to convince his colleagues that he was on to something, given that his ideas ran contrary to a long-standing theory pointing to a different type of cosmic goldmine.

It’s a sentiment that Angelika Amon, a winner of one of the four Breakthrough Prizes in Life Sciences, echoes: “What we found was not what people expected, and they had a hard time believing it,” she says of her own work. “But the data are the data.”

Amon studies aneuploidy, a condition in which cells have the wrong number of chromosomes. If this sounds bad, it is. Normally, the human genome is organized into 23 pairs of chromosomes, or 46 total. But sometimes embryos form with abnormal numbers of chromosomes—either too many or too few.

The vast majority of these aneuploidies are so lethal that early fetal death and miscarriage occur. Others produce nonlethal conditions such as Down Syndrome. And in certain cells, aneuploidies are linked to the unchecked growth that we call cancer. Amon decided to ask why this change in chromosomes seems to have such varying effects.

Human Body 101

“If you have one extra chromosome, it can be really bad for organisms—it makes you stop growing and stop proliferating,” she says. “But cancer is a disease that’s characterized by unabated growth, so there’s something happening that doesn’t make sense.”

What she found through years of work in budding yeast and mammalsis that aneuploidies produce enough stress to disable normal cellular checks and balances, which leads to a rapid accumulation of genetic mutations. In other words, abnormal numbers of chromosomes are quite detrimental even in cancer cells.

“It took us a long time for people to believe us,” she recalls. “But if aneuploidy were such a good thing, nature would have evolved it.”

Now, Amon is studying the mechanisms by which aneuploidies promote tumor growth, with the goal of identifying targets for potential cancer treatments.

Scientific strengths

Frank Bennett and Adrian Krainerhave already treated a lethal disease: The prize-winning pair developed a treatment for spinal muscular atrophy, a rare neurodegenerative disease that, in its most severe form, kills most children before they’re two years old. Approved by the FDA in 2016, the treatment is now available commercially and offers affected individuals a chance at a normal life.

“These infants that were treated by the drug, they’re getting better,” says Bennett, who works at Ionis Pharmaceuticals. “Some patients have been on the drug for over six years and they’re still improving. We don’t know what the final achievement is going to be, but they continue to improve as they’re getting dosing.”

Spinal muscular atrophy is the result of several genetic mutations that reduce the amount of a protein called survival motor neuron 1. Without it, motor neurons in the spinal cord vanish, and muscles weaken and atrophy. Bennett and Krainer realized that instead of attempting to correct the mutated genetic sequences at the root of the problem, they could instead modify the ways cells processed the genes’ correspondingly mutated transcripts.

Normally, genes are transcribed into messenger transcripts, which are then edited in a variety of ways and sent off to the cellular factories that assemble proteins. Bennett and Krainer managed to trick cells into processing a mutated transcript as though it were normal, restoring functional protein levels.

Their treatment has been administered to infants who have been diagnosed with the disease before they’re symptomatic. Now, those kids are reaching normal developmental milestones like sitting up and walking, which was previously unheard of for patients with the most severe forms of the disease.

“I think what this is telling us is that, one, neurodegenerative diseases are reversible, to some extent,” Bennett says. “And two, that if you treat prophylactically, you might prevent the disease from occurring, or at least it’ll have a milder form.” For many, a future free from the death sentences imposed by neurodegenerative diseases might seem unreachable; for Bennett, it’s possible.

“The winners of the Breakthrough Prize in Life Science show us all how it’s done,” Cori Bargmann, chair of the selection committee and a former prize winner, says in a statement. “Through creativity, innovation, persistence, and skill, each of them brought about an advance that was previously unimaginable.”

Complete List of Winners

Breakthrough Prize In Life Sciences

  • C. Frank Bennett and Adrian R. KrainerIonis Pharmaceuticals and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
    Citation: For the development of an effective antisense oligonucleotide therapy for children with the neurodegenerative disease spinal muscular atrophy.
  • Angelika AmonMassachusetts Institute of Technology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute
    Citation: For determining the consequences of aneuploidy, an abnormal chromosome number resulting from chromosome mis-segregation.
  • Xiaowei ZhuangHarvard University and Howard Hughes Medical Institute
    Citation: For discovering hidden structures in cells by developing super-resolution imaging, a method that transcends the fundamental spatial resolution limit of light microscopy.
  • Zhijian “James” ChenUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute
    Citation: For elucidating how DNA triggers immune and autoimmune responses from the interior of a cell through the discovery of the DNA-sensing enzyme cGAS.

Breakthrough Prize In Fundamental Physics

  • Charles Kane and Eugene MeleUniversity of Pennsylvania
    Citation: For new ideas about topology and symmetry in physics, leading to the prediction of a new class of materials that conduct electricity only on their surface.

Breakthrough Prize In Mathematics

  • Vincent LafforgueCNRS (National Center for Scientific Research, France) and Institut Fourier, Université Grenoble Alpes
    Citation: For ground breaking contributions to several areas of mathematics, in particular to the Langlands program in the function field case.

Special Breakthrough Prize In Fundamental Physics

  • Jocelyn Bell BurnellUniversity of Dundee and University of Oxford
    Citation: For fundamental contributions to the discovery of pulsars, and a lifetime of inspiring leadership in the scientific community.

New Horizons In Physics Prize

  • Brian MetzgerColumbia University
    Citation: For pioneering predictions of the electromagnetic signal from a neutron star merger, and for leadership in the emerging field of multi-messenger astronomy.
  • Rana Adhikari, Lisa Barsotti and Matthew EvansCalifornia Institute of Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Citation: For research on present and future ground-based detectors of gravitational waves.
  • Daniel Harlow, Daniel L. Jafferis and Aron WallMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University and Stanford University
    Citation: For fundamental insights about quantum information, quantum field theory, and gravity.

New Horizons In Mathematics Prize

  • Chenyang XuMassachusetts Institute of Technology and Beijing International Center for Mathematical Research
    Citation: For major advances in the minimal model program and applications to the moduli of algebraic varieties.
  • Karim Adiprasito and June HuhHebrew University of Jerusalem and Institute for Advanced Study
    Citation: For the development, with Eric Katz, of combinatorial Hodge theory leading to the resolution of the log-concavity conjecture of Rota.
  • Kaisa Matomäki and Maksym RadziwillUniversity of Turku and California Institute of Technology
    Citation: For fundamental breakthroughs in the understanding of local correlations of values of multiplicative functions.
PUBLISHED

Follow Us

twitter